Choose a CSR report from a company of your choice (research one online)
Read and analyze the CSR report of the company you found and answer the following questions:
- How the company defines CSR and what areas it focuses on (e.g., environmental sustainability, community engagement, employee well-being) be specific and provide examples
- How the company measures its CSR efforts (e.g., through metrics such as carbon emissions, volunteer hours, or supplier diversity) be specific and provide examples
- How the company reports its CSR performance (e.g., through graphs, charts, narratives, or case studies) be specific and provide examples
- How the company communicates its CSR goals and progress (e.g., through social media, events, or partnerships) please describe their platform(s)
- Create your own CSR report for a hypothetical company, using the knowledge and skills you gained during this exercise. Be specific and provide examples by supporting your argument(s)
5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
Content (Lay out of information) 35% | Content is accurate and all required information is presented in a logical order. | Content is accurate but some required information is missing and/or not presented in a logical order, but is still generally easy to follow. | Content is accurate but some required information is missing and/or not presented in a logical order, making it difficult to follow. | Content is either questionable or incomplete. Information is not presented in a logical order, making it difficult to follow. | Content is inaccurate. Information is incomplete, inaccurate, or not presented in a logical order, making it difficult to follow. |
Analysis (based on provided links only) 45% | Exceptional analysis with supporting arguments written in the student’s own words/opinion, or correctly credited if quoted. | Analysis is mostly neat and clean. Information is organized in a logical manner and shows some degree of student’s own words/opinion. | Satisfactory analysis developed with some supporting details written mainly in the student’s own words, or correctly credited if quoted. | Analysis is unorganized. Lacking some of the information or arguments. Very broad information | Analysis has no flow. Insufficient information and lacking some of the information. |
Examples for Why Yes/Why Not? 15% | Exceptional examples solely related to the topic or argument with supporting details and logical reasoning | Examples are presented neatly and clearly, it shows some degree of logical reasoning | Satisfactory examples with some analysis and logical reasoning | Examples are short, presented broadly with little supporting arguments | No examples provided |
Spelling and Grammar (citation) 5% | No spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors in the text. Text is in the student’s own words. | A few (5-6) errors in spelling, grammar or punctuation. Most text is in student’s own words. | No more than 7 spelling, grammar or punctuation errors. Several instances where the text is not in student’s own words. | No more than 8 spelling, grammar or punctuation errors.. Most of text is not in authors’ own words and/or no text included. | More than 10 spelling, grammar or punctuation errors. Text is copied or not included. |